This is INDEPENDENT work that you are certainly NOT going to see in conventional media.
To all readers: PLEASE HELP KEEP OVER FIVE YEARS OF WORK ONLINE...
To maintain independence, I will never run ads. I'm only ONE homeless woman, trying to do all the research, content development and web site maintenance for damn near nothing - or get this: I wouldn't still be homeless after doing all this for almost six years. I don't have the time to stop doing the WORK involved to piss away my time running bullshit ads for crap you don't need anyway.
Only 1 out every 5,000 visitors sends even a little help. If everyone reading this gave $10, I could get off the streets and be able to do more. The price of a cheap meal from a bunch of people is all I need. When I started JohnsonAndToxin, people told me it would never get me off the streets. Almost 6 years later, I'm still on the streets. Most people ignore my requests for help. But I hope you’ll think about how important it is to have someone pushing all this information to the Senate, State Attorneys General, State Governors, US FDA, JNJ shareholders, educational facilities, etc.
Please help keep JohnsonAndToxin online and me working to expose Johnson & Johnson and their 275+ subsidiaries for the benefit of every man, woman and child on the planet - and that INCLUDES YOU.
What are consumers to use until harmful chems are removed?
Keywords: jnj, johnson and johnson, johnson + johnson, J&J, shampoo, toxin, toxic, aveeno
Date Created/Edited: August 17, 2012
Less than a year after a Chinese commentary in a state-run new agency, Xinhua, published that Johnson & Johnson needs to "practice morality" with regard to toxins in the United States formulation of baby shampoo and other products, Johnson & Johnson is considering the acquisition of Shanghai-based Elsker, a baby product manufacturer.
In November of 2011, Johnson and Johnson stated that known and potentially harmful chemicals would be removed from baby care products within two years. A statement was recently released that the goal is still on schedule. My question is: If Johnson and Johnson knows these chemicals are harmful to human health, and Johnson and Johnson has safer formulations available in other countries that do not contain the carcinogens and chemicals that cause asthma, why do United States consumers have to wait two years for our products to be safe for our babies? Why doesn't Johnson and Johnson immediately pull the products that contain carcinogens from every store shelf in the United States and replace them immediately with the safer formulations already available in other countries?
On August 16, 2012, Reuters published a statement by Johnson and Johnson that known and suspected harmful chemicals will also be removed from adult products. As with baby care products, Johnson and Johnson already has safer formulations available for consumers in other countries, including: Britain, Japan, the Netherlands, South Africa, the U.K., Denmark.
Why doesn't Johnson and Johnson immediately remove the toxic version of their products from store shelves in the United States and replace them with the safer formulations available in other countries?
Why do United States consumers have to use products with known carcinogens on themselves and their children for another three years?
Will Johnson and Johnson offer medical assistance to those who were harmed by the increased incidence of asthma, allergies and cancer associated with the use of Johnson and Johnson personal care products?
1. BEIJING Correspondant (2011, November 7). China says Johnson & Johnson should 'practise morality' Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/07/china-johnson-johnson-idUSL4E7M71XW20111107
2. Emily Patterson (2012, March 23). Johnson & Johnson Baby Shampoo Poison Johnson and Toxin. Retrieved from http://www.johnsonandtoxin.com/jnj_baby_shampoo_poison.shtml
3. Jonathan Allen (2011, November 1). Health campaigners urge boycott of J&J baby shampoo Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/01/us-babyshampoo-idUSTRE7A06HN20111101
4. Shi Jing (2012, August 2). Johnson & Johnson said to buy local brand China Daily. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2012-08/02/content_15640049.htm
5. Ransdell Pierson (2011, November 17). J&J to nix baby-product contaminant within 2 years Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/17/johnsonandjohnson-idUSN1E7AF21020111117
6. Reuters (2012, August 16). J&J to remove harmful chemicals from adult products by 2015-NYT Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/16/johnsonjohnson-chemicals-idusl4e8jg0jj20120816?RPC=49