Quantcast
Close Window
   
Welcome :o)
Welcome to another year exposing the harms of Johnson & Johnson products and the executives that care more about money than human health...
 
There really is a highly effective way to put an end to mass tort lawsuits: GET JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARY KNOWN DEFECTIVE, HARMFUL AND/OR TOXIC PRODUCTS OFF THE GLOBAL MARKET
 
This work is 100% independent. I am NOT a victim, NOT a lawyer, NOT paid by anyone other than visitors to the site. And no, I do not own any stock in Johnson & Johnson.
 
Emily.
HomeAbout

Content List
100+ articles of harm and corruption by Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary products.
Click for content list...

Glad to see you :o)
March 2017 marks FIVE YEARS of work exposing harm, corruption and massive costs of flood of KNOWN HARMFUL Johnson & Johnson products.
 
This web site currently has the attention of:
click link to validate IP address through whatismyipaddress.com
 
US GOVERNMENT:
US Senate
US Department of Defense
US Department of Justice
US Homeland Security
 
GLOBAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS:
...including many Johnson & Johnson shareholders ;o)
 
Vanguard
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp
Lloyds Banking Group PLC
Royal Bank of Canada
Bank of America
Harris Trust & Savings Bank
Deutsche Bank
Macquarie Bank
PNC Bank
Crédit Agricole Bank
Royal Bank of Scotland
Raymond James Financial
BlackRock Financial Management
...and many, many more from all over the world ;o)
 
I am not paid by lawyers, doctors, etc - ONLY by visitors to the web site, the PEOPLE I am working for, PEOPLE like you. Currently reduced to only a part-time job, I donate the remainder of my time to take care of all the work involved in maintaining the site by doing the research, search engine optimized content, responding to victim emails and social media to create awareness among consumers to prevent new injuries as well as continue increasing awareness among Johnson & Johnson shareholders and global health organizations. Feel free to browse list of notable visitors to the web site.
 
God Bless You and Yours and keep you safe from harm,
Emily
 
Please send financial support to keep this very important GLOBAL consumer safety effort going...
 
Enter any amount in GiftBox below or PayPal to Email:
 
emily@johnsonandtoxin.com
 
$.00   
 
Sponsored in part by...
Examining Medicine An in-depth comprehensive, frequently updated look at extreme risks and permanent brain damage caused by psychiatric drugs.
----- / / -----
Fiddaman Blog Bob Fiddaman has been writing about the dangers of antidepressants since 2006. In 2011 he was presented with two human rights awards from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights.
----- / / -----
Special Needs Advocate Power Join me as we work hard to ensure what our very special children need.

Wealthy Most at Risk for Harm by Johnson & Johnson and Subsidiary Products
If you make over $100,000 a year, you are far more likely than lower incomes to become a victim of a Johnson & Johnson and/or subsidiary product.

Keywords: healthcare, cost, co-pay, risk, deductable, insurance, victim, salary
Date Created/Edited: August 22, 2016
 

Special Sections....
 
Mesh Files
Baby Powder (talc) Files
Risperdal Files
Levaquin Files
Xarelto Files
Hips Files
Letters to Shareholders
SEC Lawsuits Files

 
Recent Content....
The Fastest Growing Segment of Johnson & Johnson Is... (2016, November 15)
Growing over 29% in 2016, this is definitely the fastest growing segment of Johnson & Johnson!
johnson & johnson, J&J, JNJ, 2016, lawsuit, lawsuits, tort, liability
 
Third Quarter 2016 Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson Still Exploding! Now 99,000! (2016, November 15)
Growing every quarter, lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson in United States alone are now well over 99,000.
talc, risperdal, asr, hip, baby powder, tvt, mesh, lawsuit
 
The Difference Between Guinea Pig and Cash Cow (2016, September 27)
People keep saying pharma is using us as 'guinea pigs'. Uh, not quite. Take a minute to learn the difference between a 'guinea pig' and a 'cash cow'.
guinea pig, immunization, vaccination, profit, harm, autism, disability, asthma
 
Johnson & Johnson Victims at Risk of RE-Victimization (2016, August 22)
If you are currently a victim of a known harmful Johnson & Johnson subsidiary product and have high medical needs due to your injuries, you are at increased risk of becoming a victim of another known harmful Johnson & Johnson subsidiary product.
jnj, johnson and johnson, johnson & johnson, victim, mesh, hip, levaquin, risperdal
 
Wealthy Most at Risk for Harm by Johnson & Johnson and Subsidiary Products (2016, August 22)
If you make over $100,000 a year, you are far more likely than lower incomes to become a victim of a Johnson & Johnson and/or subsidiary product.
healthcare, cost, co-pay, risk, deductable, insurance, victim, salary
 
Second Quarter 2016 Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson Leap Again From 82,200 to 90,700 (2016, August 4)
Growing every quarter, lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson in United States alone are now well over 90,700.
talc, risperdal, asr, hip, baby powder, tvt, mesh, lawsuit
 
Johnson & Johnson Animas Defective Diabetes Devices (2016, August 4)
Gosh and golly gee willikers, yet another Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, Animas, totally sucks, jah?
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, animas, vibe, diabetes, insulin, device, pump
 
Johnson & Johnson Ethicrap, I Mean EthiCON, More JNJ JUNK (2016, July 25)
As I've mentioned, Johnson & Johnson has so many bad products I have to put a bunch in each article now to try to keep up. Now for EthiCON crap.
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, ethicon, harmonic ace, morcellator, physiomesh, secure strap, stapler
 
Johnson and Johnson Janssen Xarelto Slaughter (2016, July 8)
Overstating benefits, downplaying (or not disclosing) risks. Xarelto by Johnson and Johnson Janssen killing people left and right. Over 500 DEAD, 7,100 lawsuits already. Lovely, eh?
false, marketing, death, dead, xarelto, FDA, lawsuit, Janssen
 
This Convinced THREE Juries That Johnson and Johnson Talc Increases Ovarian Cancer (2016, May 14)
One very simple fact convinced THREE juries that Johnson & Johnson talc increases risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, baby, powder, cancer, lawsuit, ovarian, talc
 
It's becoming obvious to me that the wealthy, those making over $100,000 a year, are most at risk for harm by Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary products.
 
Most of the victims I've communicated with are people who were previously employed, homeowners with incomes over $100,000. One woman was a grant-writer who previously wrote over $8 million in grants, but can no longer work due to chronic illness caused by mesh. She and her son are now homeless, lost everything. Struggling to survive and help her son while chronically ill. Occupations of the victims I've communicated with include teachers, pharma reps, construction company owners. The list of previous occupations of victims is very long. Almost all of the victims that I've communicated with were employed or business owners, had homes and newer vehicles.
 
At this point, monthly cost of healthcare, co-pay and deductables are so high, an increasing number of people can't afford to meet even basic healthcare needs.
 
While watching pharmaceutical advertisements, I realize they are not settings of the middle class, the homes, surroundings and even clothing and vehicles are that of those who have incomes of $100,000 a year or more. People who make less than that don't go golfing, Disneyworld is an unanswered prayer and time on a lost lake is lost working a full-time job and a part-time job with nothing left over to support the family.
 
I know from my third-party statistics at Quantcast that the majority of the people who visit this site are those who make over $100,000 a year. If I fail, due to lack of financial support, who do you think will continue this work?
 

 

Lawyers? Hah, the lawyers that have interviewed me claim support of my work would be a conflict of interest. Yes, it would be if your motivation is to allow the harm of other human beings, including risk of your own life, for future lawsuits and millions of dollars. However, if your prime motivation is to reduce harm to human beings, thus shutting down your law firm, then support of this work would not be a conflict of interest.
 
Doctors? Pretty much the same. Support of this work would be a conflict of interest to the practice. Loss of patients would ruin profits!
 
Food and Drug Administration? LOL! Uh, notice the history of management of the Food and Drug Administration - obviously making more to demand scientists do NOT do their job, even resorting to bullying and threats ;o)
 
US Senate HELP Committee? Uh, probably not. They make a whopping $175,000 (plus added bonuses) to uphold the law, to ensure safety of consumers, to ensure that sub-organizations such as the Food and Drug Administration are doing their job - which, obviously, they are not. But that $175,000 EACH of TAX dollars is a child's allowance compared to the flood of cash rolling into their accounts from lobbyists and such to give a shit about anything more than the next round of golf or the next party, I mean fundraiser.
 
So here we are today. An increasing number of people making under $100,000 a year cannot afford even basic medical attention. However, those making over $100,000 a year are at most risk of harm by a Johnson & Johnson and/or subsidiary product as they buy the most products and use the most services, including elective services that lower incomes simply cannot afford.
 
It's kind of wild that those who call support of this work a conflict of interest are also the ones currently in the crosshairs of harm by a Johnson & Johnson and/or subsidiary product, eh? ;o)
 
Johnson & Johnson is sure not going to reach a trillion dollars in valuation if those with money are healthy, now can they?
Healthy people simply aren't profitable, and we have no more money down here.
 
You can send support in the box above....or take your chances with yet another Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary product pumped through a corrupt system ;o)
 
Resources:
1. Quantcast. Quantcast Statistics for JohnsonAndToxin. Retrieved from http://www.quantcast.com/johnsonandtoxin.com
 

 
All contents Copyright © 2012-2016 Emily Patterson / Johnson and Toxin. All rights reserved.
 
Web Site and Admin Info:
Home
About
Contact
Disclaimers
Privacy Policy
Site Statistics
Site Resources
Financial Disclosure

 
Recently Posted:
2015 Johnson & Johnson US Lawsuit Update: Jump from 48,500 to 56.500
 
Johnson & Johnson Plans to Expand Healthcare Cost Crisis and Product Liability in Asia
 
Who REALLY Pays for Drug Development? US TAXPAYERS - $21 BILLION for fiscal year 2014
 
Johnson & Johnson Janssen Xarelto Marketed In Violation of FDA Regulations
 
Johnson & Johnson Destroys Thousands of Files Related to Vaginal Mesh
 
Johnson & Johnson: The Global Lawsuit Company


 
 
Most Popular:
The Ever-Growing Number of Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson
 
Johnson & Johnson Credo Analysis
 
Johnson & Johnson $4 Billion for DePuy Hip Harm in U.S., With Lawsuits in at Least 4 More Countries