The content you requested is below this very important information...
WITHOUT FINANCIAL SUPPORT, this list of content, six years of work WILL BE GONE FROM THE INTERNET. SURVIVING ON AN EXTREMELY LIMITED INCOME, I HAVE NO MONEY TO PUT INTO THIS EFFORT.
The site has had well over 2 MILLION page views. I've received thousands of emails from victims asking how the hell Johnson & Johnson gets away with slaughtering people with their products. Gee, likely because there is no financial support for this side of the fight to expose the horrendous flood of harmful products and the corruption that allows this crap to get on the market in the first place.
SO RUN ALONG AND POISON YOUR OWN BABIES AT THE REQUEST OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON...they obviously don't want to give up their easy money from talc cancer victims ;o)
MOMS AND DADS IN THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES (United States, European Union, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Israel, South Africa, Turkey, and Indonesia) PAY VERY CLOSE ATTENTION TO JOHNSON & JOHNSON STATEMENTS ON TALC
THEY ARE FLAT OUT REFUSING TO REMOVE TALC FROM PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR BABIES OR FEMALE HYGEINE: Johnson & Johnson has set up an entire web site to continue bullshitting people about the safety of products containing talc. Here is the J&J BULLSHIT "TALC IS SAFE DAMMIT" SITE. Their own internal documents PROVE they are well aware that talc increases the risk of developing LUNG CANCER, gee, just lost the first lawsuit for talc causing LUNG CANCER. It has also been shown that talc likely increases the risk of developing ovarian cancer by at least 30%. Ovarian cancer is a SILENT KILLER - pretty much once you realize you have it, you're dead.
However, no one needs to bother trying to read and interpret stacks of study results because Johnson & Johnson's own internal documents, such as this, PROVE they are well-aware of the health risks related to the use of talc-based products:
"... the talc industry will be perceived by the public like it perceives the cigarette industry: denying the obvious in the face of all evidence to the contrary."
Johnson & Johnson quite literally convinced three generations of women to poison their own babies with known cancer-causing talc. They tossed it at us for FREE in MATERNITY WARDS FOR GOD'S SAKES! I don't know about you, but I'm not real thrilled about the fact that I was lied to and convinced to poison MY OWN BABIES with Johnson & Johnson cancer-causing baby products, the original reason I started this web site.
Today is April 24, 2018 at 11:00 PM Eastern US time.
I have no money to pay the server fees on the 26th of April. Without help, the site goes down, deleting THIS ENTIRE LIST OF OVER 150 ARTICLES EXPOSING MASSIVE HARM BY JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARY PRODUCTS, as well as corruption in the United States Food and Drug Administration, more corruption in the United States Senate HELP Committee, the committee responsible for overseeing the United States Food and Drug Administration. Also, I have discovered that Mr. and Mrs. Obama BOTH worked for Sidley Austin, a corporate DEFENSE attorney group with experience defending Johnson & Johnson and other pharmaceutical companies. Michelle was a partner and Barack her understudy intern.
This site has had over 2 MILLION page views since I put it online in March of 2012. Numerous visitors, such as Johnson & Johnson, global financial institutions, global health organizations, insurance companies, other pharma, gov agencies such as US CDC, US FDA, US Senate, US Homeland Security, US Department of Defense, etc. Basically, all the corrupt...and yes, I can prove the visits by logged IP address. For example, the site has received over 6,000 visits from Johnson & Johnson servers alone.
This site is being watched DAILY by all these very important people.
I have got to raise $250 to keep this work online.
I have a fixed income and cannot pay for all this myself.
Will you please help?
Raised as of 11:00 PM April 24, 2018 Eastern US time: $0
Not ONE PENNY since February. I have no money to keep this online. I'm very sorry I have no money. I could, and did, do all the work, but not enough support to continue.
Still need to raise $250 before April 26, 2018
This six years of work is the LARGEST, if not the ONLY, site exposing the massive consumer harm by Johnson & Johnson products and the corruption in the United States government that allows Johnson & Johnson and their 260+ subsidiaries to continue pushing KNOWN HARMFUL consumer goods, pharmaaceuticals and medical devices on consumers around the world.
If the site goes down, I will have no way to come up with even more money to put it back up. PLEASE HELP KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING
Please enter any amount you can contribute, even if only a few dollars. I do NOT post who sent the gift unless the giver specifically requests their contact information posted with the gift amount. By law, givers of gifts under $13,000 do NOT have to be disclosed during any audit, and I'm pretty certain no one will contribute anywhere near that much! I truly value your privacy. I do not ever request help via email or any other means, I send a 'thank you' and delete your contact information. Gifts are sent through PayPal and I do NOT have access to any transaction information, ensuring YOUR safety and privacy.
Q to Alex Gorsky, Chairman/CEO of Johnson and Johnson, would you give your USA banned drug Risperdal to your father, if he had dementia?
Keywords: risperdal, elderly, dementia, US, Australia, black box, warning, death
Date Created: August 28, 2015
This article was sent to me by a follower and is posted on his LinkedIn profile. I was asked to post on the Johnson and Toxin site and help to get this information to JNJ investors.
If not , why have you not warned my mother, and all the other Australian mothers and fathers, that your blockbuster anti-pyschotic drug Risperdal has an increased mortality risk for elderly dementia patients, based upon a very short trial period of only 10 weeks?
Yet since 2005, Johnson and Johnson has provided your USA mothers and fathers with the ultimate "black box warning" about the Risperdal death risk as follows:
WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA-RELATED PSYCHOSIS Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. RISPERDAL is not approved for use in patients with dementia-related psychosis.
I challenge you to immediately provide the same black box death warning to all the elderly dementia patients in Australia.
Your 2009 award speech at the Healthcare Businesswoman's Association included the following comments:
"My parents and my five siblings were my first and among the best mentors anyone could wish for. They told me the things that really mattered and delivered many “tough love” messages (as they say) the greatest lessons in life are often learned at home."
How would your mother view your actions now if she was alive? What would your siblings and father advise you now on this issue?
In my opinion, your drug is so powerful in restricting blood flow, and for causing numerous other side effects, that my mother was soon in a wheel chair after taking the medication. When the dose was later increased by 50%, she was immediately bed-ridden that afternoon.
Within two weeks after removing her from your deadly “medication”, she not only was able to resume walking on her own, but also actually walked a recorded 26 minutes NON STOP around the nursing home, without any human assistance.
Does it concern you that dementia is now the no 2 cause of death in Australia, according to the latest statistics from Alzheimer’s Australia (AA)?
AA also notes on its Fight Dementia website, www.fightdementia.org.au:
"about half of people in residential aged care facilities and up to 80% of those with dementia are receiving psychotropic medications, although this varies between facilities. There is evidence to suggest that in some cases these medications have been prescribed inappropriately (Hosia-Randell & Pitkälä, 2005; National Prescribing Service, 2013).
Would you publicly release Risperdal's proportion of this dementia psychotropic market to Australian patients and carers?
You recently published on Mothers Day 2015 the following comments in support of mothers around the world:
"Imagine the world you want to see in 2030—what is important to your family, and what are you doing to make that a reality? Moms +SocialGood is a one-day event dedicated to the power of moms and families to create a better future for their communities, and the role of social media and philanthropy to boost health and happiness for moms and babies everywhere.”
The Global Moms Challenge website at www.globalmomschallenge.org notes it is "an initiative of the United Nations Foundation, which connects people ideas and resources to support the UN and its causes, and is made possible by support from Johnson & Johnson, which is committed to showing that small acts of care can grow into a world of difference."
So do you think your peddling of Risperdal to our mums in Australia is going to boost their health and happiness? If you are really serious about your United Nations project, Moms + SocialGood, will you show a small act of care and withdraw Risperdal immediately from prescription in Australia for elderly dementia patients.
Will you provide written communication to all our medical practitioners in Australia who have been routinely ensuring our nursing home patients are full of anti-psychotic drugs?
Or will Moms+Social Good in Australia, supported by my expanding team of concerned professionals in the medico/legal community, need to show you how “the role of social media and philanthropy” could work to boost the health of moms, by highlighting your company’s lack of governance, absence of corporate ethics and breach of our laws.
I note your army background, and question why our Australian troops are expected to support your country’s so-called “war on terror”, yet you happily steer your army of sales representatives in Australia to every increasing targets, in direct conflict with your prominent black box death warnings in the USA.
I am sure I don’t need to remind you of the unprecedented litigation your company received by a majority of the State and Federal regulators in your country.
I also don't need to remind you of your central role relating to the allegations of payment of kick-backs to doctors, and to Omnicare, the largest nursing home pharmacy, to purchase and recommend Risperdal for dementia patients. My understanding from various reports is that you settled these actions for around US$3 billion, and signed a Corporate Integrity Agreement regulating your future conduct.
As the Chairman and CEO of the Board, a practice rarely condoned these days in Australia for ethical reasons, do you consider your requirement to act with integrity only applies to your behaviour in your own country, and not your strong ally in the war on terror?
I know what my heart says about the real war on terror – and it certainly is not in the Middle East.
I will save my views on how you are treating our young autistic children with Risperdal to another post, and perhaps another forum.
Your immediate action is sought to withdraw this drug for dementia patients in Australia - why should one more mother (or father) have to suffer and die at the hands of Risperdal, whilst your company, and you in particular, examine your conscience.
Can’t you find better causes to make money, linked to health and not death?
Where is your respect for humanity and dignity for our elderly citizens?