The content you requested is below this very important information...
WITHOUT FINANCIAL SUPPORT, this list of content, six years of work WILL BE GONE FROM THE INTERNET. SURVIVING ON AN EXTREMELY LIMITED INCOME, I HAVE NO MONEY TO PUT INTO THIS EFFORT.
The site has had well over 2 MILLION page views. I've received thousands of emails from victims asking how the hell Johnson & Johnson gets away with slaughtering people with their products. Gee, likely because there is no financial support for this side of the fight to expose the horrendous flood of harmful products and the corruption that allows this crap to get on the market in the first place.
SO RUN ALONG AND POISON YOUR OWN BABIES AT THE REQUEST OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON...they obviously don't want to give up their easy money from talc cancer victims ;o)
MOMS AND DADS IN THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES (United States, European Union, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Israel, South Africa, Turkey, and Indonesia) PAY VERY CLOSE ATTENTION TO JOHNSON & JOHNSON STATEMENTS ON TALC
THEY ARE FLAT OUT REFUSING TO REMOVE TALC FROM PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR BABIES OR FEMALE HYGEINE: Johnson & Johnson has set up an entire web site to continue bullshitting people about the safety of products containing talc. Here is the J&J BULLSHIT "TALC IS SAFE DAMMIT" SITE. Their own internal documents PROVE they are well aware that talc increases the risk of developing LUNG CANCER, gee, just lost the first lawsuit for talc causing LUNG CANCER. It has also been shown that talc likely increases the risk of developing ovarian cancer by at least 30%. Ovarian cancer is a SILENT KILLER - pretty much once you realize you have it, you're dead.
However, no one needs to bother trying to read and interpret stacks of study results because Johnson & Johnson's own internal documents, such as this, PROVE they are well-aware of the health risks related to the use of talc-based products:
"... the talc industry will be perceived by the public like it perceives the cigarette industry: denying the obvious in the face of all evidence to the contrary."
Johnson & Johnson quite literally convinced three generations of women to poison their own babies with known cancer-causing talc. They tossed it at us for FREE in MATERNITY WARDS FOR GOD'S SAKES! I don't know about you, but I'm not real thrilled about the fact that I was lied to and convinced to poison MY OWN BABIES with Johnson & Johnson cancer-causing baby products, the original reason I started this web site.
Today is April 24, 2018 at 11:00 PM Eastern US time.
I have no money to pay the server fees on the 26th of April. Without help, the site goes down, deleting THIS ENTIRE LIST OF OVER 150 ARTICLES EXPOSING MASSIVE HARM BY JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARY PRODUCTS, as well as corruption in the United States Food and Drug Administration, more corruption in the United States Senate HELP Committee, the committee responsible for overseeing the United States Food and Drug Administration. Also, I have discovered that Mr. and Mrs. Obama BOTH worked for Sidley Austin, a corporate DEFENSE attorney group with experience defending Johnson & Johnson and other pharmaceutical companies. Michelle was a partner and Barack her understudy intern.
This site has had over 2 MILLION page views since I put it online in March of 2012. Numerous visitors, such as Johnson & Johnson, global financial institutions, global health organizations, insurance companies, other pharma, gov agencies such as US CDC, US FDA, US Senate, US Homeland Security, US Department of Defense, etc. Basically, all the corrupt...and yes, I can prove the visits by logged IP address. For example, the site has received over 6,000 visits from Johnson & Johnson servers alone.
This site is being watched DAILY by all these very important people.
I have got to raise $250 to keep this work online.
I have a fixed income and cannot pay for all this myself.
Will you please help?
Raised as of 11:00 PM April 24, 2018 Eastern US time: $0
Not ONE PENNY since February. I have no money to keep this online. I'm very sorry I have no money. I could, and did, do all the work, but not enough support to continue.
Still need to raise $250 before April 26, 2018
This six years of work is the LARGEST, if not the ONLY, site exposing the massive consumer harm by Johnson & Johnson products and the corruption in the United States government that allows Johnson & Johnson and their 260+ subsidiaries to continue pushing KNOWN HARMFUL consumer goods, pharmaaceuticals and medical devices on consumers around the world.
If the site goes down, I will have no way to come up with even more money to put it back up. PLEASE HELP KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING
Please enter any amount you can contribute, even if only a few dollars. I do NOT post who sent the gift unless the giver specifically requests their contact information posted with the gift amount. By law, givers of gifts under $13,000 do NOT have to be disclosed during any audit, and I'm pretty certain no one will contribute anywhere near that much! I truly value your privacy. I do not ever request help via email or any other means, I send a 'thank you' and delete your contact information. Gifts are sent through PayPal and I do NOT have access to any transaction information, ensuring YOUR safety and privacy.
Just how risky is it to use a baby shampoo that contains 200 times the OSHA safe exposure limit of formaldehyde on your child? Read this to find out.
Keywords: jnj, johnson and johnson, johnson & johnson, J&J, toxic, carcinogen, shampoo, baby
Date Created/Edited: March 23, 1012
After decades of known health risks from exposure to formaldehyde, it was finally added to the EPA list of known carcinogens in the 12th Report on Carcinogens, published by the National Toxicology Program in June of 2011. It was added because it was finally accepted that formaldehyde increases the risk of leukemia, nasal cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer. However, formaldehyde remains in numerous consumer goods, including baby shampoo at rates hundreds of times higher than the threshold set by the EPA to be below the level for increased risk of developing cancer.
TIME Healthland reports: "It's also an extremely nasty substance that can cause irritation in the eyes and breathing problems in human beings at elevated levels (elevated being more than 0.1 parts per million)." Yet formaldehyde levels in Johnson's baby shampoo was found at 210 parts per million as reported by RSC, Advancing the Chemical Industry.
Although formaldehyde has finally been declared a carcinogen, no limitations on its inclusion in consumer goods, from building materials to body care, have been set by government agencies. It is up to consumers to choose products without formaldehyde, even though it is not on product labels or required on literature about the products that continue to include this known carcinogen.
The most talked about exposure to formaldehyde at the current time is from hair straightening products such as Brazillian Blowout, cosmetics such as Johnson & Johnson, and other, baby shampoos and consumer soap products. It is created by the breakdown of quaternium-15, which is used as a preservative. According to OSHA, the 15 minute, short-term, limit for exposure in the workplace for an average-sized adult is 2 parts per million (PPM) to prevent exposure from reaching the limit known to increase the risk of adverse health effects. In addition, health effects caused by formaldehyde are supposed to be listed on the label of the product if airborne concentrations can reach or exceed 0.1 ppm.
Testing of Johnson and Johnson baby shampoo revealed that the formaldehyde concentration in the samples tested were as high as 210 ppm. Some of the products tested had levels of formaldehyde double what was found in Johnson & Johnson baby shampoo. A normal, thinking, rational mind can comprehend that the level of 210 or more ppm dumped on a baby or used to wash a child will far exceed the safety standard set by OSHA of 2 ppm for an adult, as well as requiring the adverse health effects on the label because it is quite likely that the airborne concentration will reach the 0.1 ppm threshold. This is simply common sense. However, cosmetics are not regulated and do not require the same safety warning information as products covered by OSHA which require proper labeling for products used in a work environment that contain this high of a level of formaldehyde.
It is already clear that formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen, as it is classified as such by the National Toxicology Program. Further research reveals a number of other health effects related to high formaldehyde exposures. It is interesting that the corresponding health conditions associated with formaldehyde exposure are dramatically on the rise in our children, such as cancers, leukemia and other chronic medical conditions such as asthma, allergies and eczema.
OSHA has established that exposure levels above 2 ppm increase the risk of developing cancers caused by excessive formaldehyde. However, other adverse reactions occur at levels less than 1 ppm. These include wheezing, watery eyes, coughing, nausea, skin irritation and burning of the eyes, nose and throat.
Since wheezing was mentioned by the National Cancer Institute, and asthma rates have dramatically increased during the same time frame as formaldehyde being used in building materials and consumer goods such as cosmetics (soaps, shampoos, lotions, creams) , I decided to check further into this connection on the National Library of Medicine. According to numerous studies, there is definitely a correlation between formaldehyde exposure and the risk of developing asthma and lower respiratory infections in children. One of the studies even went so far as to state that formaldehyde exposure 'induces' asthma - meaning that it causes asthma. In addition to phthalates, which are synthetic fragrances known to increase the risk of developing asthma, it is not a wonder that the rate of asthma has skyrocketed over the past four decades.
Skin irritation was another risk associated with formaldehyde exposure that was mentioned by the National Cancer Institute document. Again, numerous studies show that eczema and dermatitis are definitely increased with formaldehyde exposure. Eczema and asthma are often presented together, most likely due to a higher concentration of exposure to formaldehyde in the home.
WalMart decided not to get sued over a body care product again so they banned certain chemicals from products they carry in their stores. Formaldehyde was among those chemicals. After 20 years of advocacy, formaldehyde releasing chemicals are no longer used in products carried by WalMart. Finally!
1. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2011, June). 12th Report on Carcinogens (RoC) United States National Toxicology Program. Retrieved from http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/?objectid=03C9AF75-E1BF-FF40-DBA9EC0928DF8B15
2. Bryan Walsh (2011, June 11). Why the Federal Government Finally Acted on Chemical Safety Time Healthland. Retrieved from http://healthland.time.com/2011/06/11/why-the-federal-government-finally-acted-on-chemical-safety/
3. Hepeng Jia/Beijing, China (2009, August). Johnson & Johnson involved in chemical ingredient litigation Royal Society of Chemistry. Retrieved from http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Issues/2009/August/JohnsonJohnsonInvolvedInChemicalIngredientLitigation.asp
4. Frank Meilinger (2011, September 22). Letter to Mr. Michael Brady CEO, GIB LLC dba Brazilian Blowout United States Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/formaldehyde/brazilian_blowout_letter.html
5. Frank Meilinger (2011, June 10). Formaldehyde and Cancer Risk National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/formaldehyde