Quantcast
Close Window
   
Welcome :o)
Welcome to another year exposing the harms of Johnson & Johnson products and the executives that care more about money than human health...
 
There really is a highly effective way to put an end to mass tort lawsuits: GET JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARY KNOWN DEFECTIVE, HARMFUL AND/OR TOXIC PRODUCTS OFF THE GLOBAL MARKET
 
This work is 100% independent. I am NOT a victim, NOT a lawyer, NOT paid by anyone other than visitors to the site. And no, I do not own any stock in Johnson & Johnson.
 
Emily.
HomeAbout

Content List
100+ articles of harm and corruption by Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary products.
Click for content list...

Glad to see you :o)
This web site currently has the attention of:
click link to validate IP address through whatismyipaddress.com
 
US GOVERNMENT:
US Senate
US Department of Defense
US Department of Justice
US Homeland Security
 
GLOBAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS:
...including many Johnson & Johnson shareholders ;o)
 
Vanguard
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp
Lloyds Banking Group PLC
Royal Bank of Canada
Bank of America
Harris Trust & Savings Bank
Deutsche Bank
Macquarie Bank
PNC Bank
Crédit Agricole Bank
Royal Bank of Scotland
Raymond James Financial
BlackRock Financial Management
...and many, many more from all over the world ;o)
 
MEDIA: time http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/209.251.208.248
 
Today, there are over 100,000 (more than 24,000 added first three quarters of 2016!) - and that's in the US alone! There's not even a guess as to how many lawsuits they are facing around the world for known harmful devices, drugs and products.
 
If you can help keep this work going with a small gift, that would be great. I take care of the rest of the costs and work involved in maintaining the site, the research, the search engine optimized content, responding to victim emails and social media to create awareness among consumers to prevent new injuries as well as create awareness among Johnson & Johnson shareholders, such as Vanguard, JPMorgan, CitiGroup, Bank of America, etc, and global health organizations such as WHO and UK's National Health Services. Feel free to browse list of notable visitors to the web site.
 
God Bless You and Yours and keep you safe from harm,
Emily
 
Enter any amount in GiftBox below or PayPal to Email:
 
emily@johnsonandtoxin.com
 
$.00   
 
Sponsored in part by...
Examining Medicine An in-depth comprehensive, frequently updated look at extreme risks and permanent brain damage caused by psychiatric drugs.
----- / / -----
Fiddaman Blog Bob Fiddaman has been writing about the dangers of antidepressants since 2006. In 2011 he was presented with two human rights awards from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights.
----- / / -----
Special Needs Advocate Power Join me as we work hard to ensure what our very special children need.

What Contains Formaldehyde at 200 Times OSHA Safe Exposure Limit? Johnson & Johnson Baby Shampoo.
Just how risky is it to use a baby shampoo that contains 200 times the OSHA safe exposure limit of formaldehyde on your child? Read this to find out.

Keywords: jnj, johnson and johnson, johnson & johnson, J&J, toxic, carcinogen, shampoo, baby
Date Created/Edited: March 23, 1012
 

Special Sections....
 
Mesh Files
Baby Powder (talc) Files
Risperdal Files
Levaquin Files
Xarelto Files
Hips Files
Letters to Shareholders
SEC Lawsuits Files

 
Recent Content....
The Fastest Growing Segment of Johnson & Johnson Is... (2016, November 15)
Growing over 29% in 2016, this is definitely the fastest growing segment of Johnson & Johnson!
johnson & johnson, J&J, JNJ, 2016, lawsuit, lawsuits, tort, liability
 
Third Quarter 2016 Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson Still Exploding! Now 99,000! (2016, November 15)
Growing every quarter, lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson in United States alone are now well over 99,000.
talc, risperdal, asr, hip, baby powder, tvt, mesh, lawsuit
 
The Difference Between Guinea Pig and Cash Cow (2016, September 27)
People keep saying pharma is using us as 'guinea pigs'. Uh, not quite. Take a minute to learn the difference between a 'guinea pig' and a 'cash cow'.
guinea pig, immunization, vaccination, profit, harm, autism, disability, asthma
 
Johnson & Johnson Victims at Risk of RE-Victimization (2016, August 22)
If you are currently a victim of a known harmful Johnson & Johnson subsidiary product and have high medical needs due to your injuries, you are at increased risk of becoming a victim of another known harmful Johnson & Johnson subsidiary product.
jnj, johnson and johnson, johnson & johnson, victim, mesh, hip, levaquin, risperdal
 
Wealthy Most at Risk for Harm by Johnson & Johnson and Subsidiary Products (2016, August 22)
If you make over $100,000 a year, you are far more likely than lower incomes to become a victim of a Johnson & Johnson and/or subsidiary product.
healthcare, cost, co-pay, risk, deductable, insurance, victim, salary
 
Second Quarter 2016 Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson Leap Again From 82,200 to 90,700 (2016, August 4)
Growing every quarter, lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson in United States alone are now well over 90,700.
talc, risperdal, asr, hip, baby powder, tvt, mesh, lawsuit
 
Johnson & Johnson Animas Defective Diabetes Devices (2016, August 4)
Gosh and golly gee willikers, yet another Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, Animas, totally sucks, jah?
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, animas, vibe, diabetes, insulin, device, pump
 
Johnson & Johnson Ethicrap, I Mean EthiCON, More JNJ JUNK (2016, July 25)
As I've mentioned, Johnson & Johnson has so many bad products I have to put a bunch in each article now to try to keep up. Now for EthiCON crap.
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, ethicon, harmonic ace, morcellator, physiomesh, secure strap, stapler
 
Johnson and Johnson Janssen Xarelto Slaughter (2016, July 8)
Overstating benefits, downplaying (or not disclosing) risks. Xarelto by Johnson and Johnson Janssen killing people left and right. Over 500 DEAD, 7,100 lawsuits already. Lovely, eh?
false, marketing, death, dead, xarelto, FDA, lawsuit, Janssen
 
This Convinced THREE Juries That Johnson and Johnson Talc Increases Ovarian Cancer (2016, May 14)
One very simple fact convinced THREE juries that Johnson & Johnson talc increases risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, baby, powder, cancer, lawsuit, ovarian, talc
 
After decades of known health risks from exposure to formaldehyde, it was finally added to the EPA list of known carcinogens in the 12th Report on Carcinogens, published by the National Toxicology Program in June of 2011. It was added because it was finally accepted that formaldehyde increases the risk of leukemia, nasal cancer and nasopharyngeal cancer. However, formaldehyde remains in numerous consumer goods, including baby shampoo at rates hundreds of times higher than the threshold set by the EPA to be below the level for increased risk of developing cancer.

TIME Healthland reports: "It's also an extremely nasty substance that can cause irritation in the eyes and breathing problems in human beings at elevated levels (elevated being more than 0.1 parts per million)." Yet formaldehyde levels in Johnson's baby shampoo was found at 210 parts per million as reported by RSC, Advancing the Chemical Industry.
 
Although formaldehyde has finally been declared a carcinogen, no limitations on its inclusion in consumer goods, from building materials to body care, have been set by government agencies. It is up to consumers to choose products without formaldehyde, even though it is not on product labels or required on literature about the products that continue to include this known carcinogen.

The most talked about exposure to formaldehyde at the current time is from hair straightening products such as Brazillian Blowout, cosmetics such as Johnson & Johnson, and other, baby shampoos and consumer soap products. It is created by the breakdown of quaternium-15, which is used as a preservative. According to OSHA, the 15 minute, short-term, limit for exposure in the workplace for an average-sized adult is 2 parts per million (PPM) to prevent exposure from reaching the limit known to increase the risk of adverse health effects. In addition, health effects caused by formaldehyde are supposed to be listed on the label of the product if airborne concentrations can reach or exceed 0.1 ppm.

Testing of Johnson and Johnson baby shampoo revealed that the formaldehyde concentration in the samples tested were as high as 210 ppm. Some of the products tested had levels of formaldehyde double what was found in Johnson & Johnson baby shampoo. A normal, thinking, rational mind can comprehend that the level of 210 or more ppm dumped on a baby or used to wash a child will far exceed the safety standard set by OSHA of 2 ppm for an adult, as well as requiring the adverse health effects on the label because it is quite likely that the airborne concentration will reach the 0.1 ppm threshold. This is simply common sense. However, cosmetics are not regulated and do not require the same safety warning information as products covered by OSHA which require proper labeling for products used in a work environment that contain this high of a level of formaldehyde.


 

It is already clear that formaldehyde is a known human carcinogen, as it is classified as such by the National Toxicology Program. Further research reveals a number of other health effects related to high formaldehyde exposures. It is interesting that the corresponding health conditions associated with formaldehyde exposure are dramatically on the rise in our children, such as cancers, leukemia and other chronic medical conditions such as asthma, allergies and eczema.

OSHA has established that exposure levels above 2 ppm increase the risk of developing cancers caused by excessive formaldehyde. However, other adverse reactions occur at levels less than 1 ppm. These include wheezing, watery eyes, coughing, nausea, skin irritation and burning of the eyes, nose and throat.

Since wheezing was mentioned by the National Cancer Institute, and asthma rates have dramatically increased during the same time frame as formaldehyde being used in building materials and consumer goods such as cosmetics (soaps, shampoos, lotions, creams) , I decided to check further into this connection on the National Library of Medicine. According to numerous studies, there is definitely a correlation between formaldehyde exposure and the risk of developing asthma and lower respiratory infections in children. One of the studies even went so far as to state that formaldehyde exposure 'induces' asthma - meaning that it causes asthma. In addition to phthalates, which are synthetic fragrances known to increase the risk of developing asthma, it is not a wonder that the rate of asthma has skyrocketed over the past four decades.

Skin irritation was another risk associated with formaldehyde exposure that was mentioned by the National Cancer Institute document. Again, numerous studies show that eczema and dermatitis are definitely increased with formaldehyde exposure. Eczema and asthma are often presented together, most likely due to a higher concentration of exposure to formaldehyde in the home.
 
UPDATE:
WalMart decided not to get sued over a body care product again so they banned certain chemicals from products they carry in their stores. Formaldehyde was among those chemicals. After 20 years of advocacy, formaldehyde releasing chemicals are no longer used in products carried by WalMart. Finally!
 
Resources:
1. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2011, June). 12th Report on Carcinogens (RoC) United States National Toxicology Program. Retrieved from http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/?objectid=03C9AF75-E1BF-FF40-DBA9EC0928DF8B15
 
2. Bryan Walsh (2011, June 11). Why the Federal Government Finally Acted on Chemical Safety Time Healthland. Retrieved from http://healthland.time.com/2011/06/11/why-the-federal-government-finally-acted-on-chemical-safety/
 
3. Hepeng Jia/Beijing, China (2009, August). Johnson & Johnson involved in chemical ingredient litigation Royal Society of Chemistry. Retrieved from http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Issues/2009/August/JohnsonJohnsonInvolvedInChemicalIngredientLitigation.asp
 
4. Frank Meilinger (2011, September 22). Letter to Mr. Michael Brady CEO, GIB LLC dba Brazilian Blowout United States Department of Labor. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/formaldehyde/brazilian_blowout_letter.html
 
5. Frank Meilinger (2011, June 10). Formaldehyde and Cancer Risk National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/formaldehyde
 
 
All contents Copyright © 2012-2016 Emily Patterson / Johnson and Toxin. All rights reserved.
 
Web Site and Admin Info:
Home
About
Contact
Disclaimers
Privacy Policy
Site Statistics
Site Resources
Financial Disclosure

 
Recently Posted:
2015 Johnson & Johnson US Lawsuit Update: Jump from 48,500 to 56.500
 
Johnson & Johnson Plans to Expand Healthcare Cost Crisis and Product Liability in Asia
 
Who REALLY Pays for Drug Development? US TAXPAYERS - $21 BILLION for fiscal year 2014
 
Johnson & Johnson Janssen Xarelto Marketed In Violation of FDA Regulations
 
Johnson & Johnson Destroys Thousands of Files Related to Vaginal Mesh
 
Johnson & Johnson: The Global Lawsuit Company


 
 
Most Popular:
The Ever-Growing Number of Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson
 
Johnson & Johnson Credo Analysis
 
Johnson & Johnson $4 Billion for DePuy Hip Harm in U.S., With Lawsuits in at Least 4 More Countries