Close Window
Welcome :o)
Welcome to another year exposing the harms of Johnson & Johnson products and the executives that care more about money than human health...
There really is a highly effective way to put an end to mass tort lawsuits: GET JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARY KNOWN DEFECTIVE, HARMFUL AND/OR TOXIC PRODUCTS OFF THE GLOBAL MARKET
This work is 100% independent. I am NOT a victim, NOT a lawyer, NOT paid by anyone other than visitors to the site. And no, I do not own any stock in Johnson & Johnson.

Content List
100+ articles of harm and corruption by Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary products.
Click for content list...

Hi All,
This is INDEPENDENT work that you are certainly NOT going to see in conventional media.
To maintain independence, I will never run ads. I'm only ONE homeless woman, trying to do all the research, content development and web site maintenance for damn near nothing - or get this: I wouldn't still be homeless after doing all this for almost six years. I don't have the time to stop doing the WORK involved to piss away my time running bullshit ads for crap you don't need anyway.
Only 1 out every 5,000 visitors sends even a little help. If everyone reading this gave $10, I could get off the streets and be able to do more. The price of a cheap meal from a bunch of people is all I need. When I started JohnsonAndToxin, people told me it would never get me off the streets. Almost 6 years later, I'm still on the streets. Most people ignore my requests for help. But I hope you’ll think about how important it is to have someone pushing all this information to the Senate, State Attorneys General, State Governors, US FDA, JNJ shareholders, educational facilities, etc.
Please help keep JohnsonAndToxin online and me working to expose Johnson & Johnson and their 275+ subsidiaries for the benefit of every man, woman and child on the planet - and that INCLUDES YOU.
Thank you,
Glad to see you :o)
Hi All,
This is INDEPENDENT work that you are certainly NOT going to see in conventional media.
Gifts of support are always very much appreciated...
Thank you,

Notable visitors to the web site include:
United States Air Force
US Senate
US Department of Defense
US Department of Justice
US Homeland Security
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp
Lloyds Banking Group PLC
Royal Bank of Canada
Bank of America
Harris Trust & Savings Bank
Deutsche Bank
Macquarie Bank
PNC Bank
Crédit Agricole Bank
Royal Bank of Scotland
Raymond James Financial
BlackRock Financial Management
...and many, many more from all over the world ;o)
Feel free to browse list of notable visitors to the web site.
Sponsored in part by...
Risperdal Boys Project Undisclosed to patients, Risperdal causes breast growth in boys.
----- / / -----
Examining Medicine An in-depth comprehensive, frequently updated look at extreme risks and permanent brain damage caused by psychiatric drugs.
----- / / -----
Fiddaman Blog Bob Fiddaman has been writing about the dangers of antidepressants since 2006. In 2011 he was presented with two human rights awards from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights.
----- / / -----
Special Needs Advocate Power Join me as we work hard to ensure what our very special children need.

A Strong Argument Against Johnson & Johnson Control of Vaping or E-Cigs
Known harmful, misrepresented drugs. Known harmful, misrepresented devices. Known toxic ingredients in baby products. Do NOT let Johnson & Johnson get control of vaping or e-cigs.

Keywords: vape, vaping, vaper, e-cig, control, regulation, smoking, health
Date Created/Edited: 2014, December 9

Most Recent Content....
Johnson & Johnson Begs US FDA to Expand Xarelto Slaughter
After killing around 2,000 people in the United States in 2016 alone, Johnson & Johnson wants to spread the deaths even more!
Johnson & Johnson Facing Over $100 BILLION in Lawsuit Debt
With a flood of lawsuits pouring in from around the world, Johnson & Johnson is facing at least $100 BILLION lawsuit debt.
The Johnson & Johnson Drugged Kids Pension Plan
Teacher and state retirement funds invest in Johnson & Johnson, the DRUGGED KIDS PENSION PLAN
Johnson & Johnson Lost $417 Million on Talc, But Who REALLY Gets the Money?
Quite a bit of the money goes directly back to, you guessed it, Johnson & Johnson!
Second Quarter 2017 Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson
Lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson in United States holding at 106,600! DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL PRODUCTS FACING LAWSUITS OR LAWUITS FILED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES!
Johnson & Johnson Tylenol Massacre
From dead babies to killer liver damage to autism to dimentia, harmful effects of Tylenol creates a massive flood of permanently injured and sometimes dead, victims.
Special Sections....
Mesh Files
Baby Powder (talc) Files
Risperdal Files
Levaquin Files
Xarelto Files
Hips Files
Letters to Shareholders
SEC Lawsuits Files

Recent Content....
Why President Trump Should Shut Down US FDA (2017, March 28)
Healthcare organizations around the world depend on US FDA decisions, however, profit, rather than safety, seems to be the primary motivation.
healthcare, health, obamacare, donald, trump, fda, fraud, kickback
The Fastest Growing Segment of Johnson & Johnson Is... (2016, November 15)
Growing over 29% in 2016, this is definitely the fastest growing segment of Johnson & Johnson!
johnson & johnson, J&J, JNJ, 2016, lawsuit, lawsuits, tort, liability
Third Quarter 2016 Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson Still Exploding! Now 99,000! (2016, November 15)
Growing every quarter, lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson in United States alone are now well over 99,000.
talc, risperdal, asr, hip, baby powder, tvt, mesh, lawsuit
The Difference Between Guinea Pig and Cash Cow (2016, September 27)
People keep saying pharma is using us as 'guinea pigs'. Uh, not quite. Take a minute to learn the difference between a 'guinea pig' and a 'cash cow'.
guinea pig, immunization, vaccination, profit, harm, autism, disability, asthma
Johnson & Johnson Victims at Risk of RE-Victimization (2016, August 22)
If you are currently a victim of a known harmful Johnson & Johnson subsidiary product and have high medical needs due to your injuries, you are at increased risk of becoming a victim of another known harmful Johnson & Johnson subsidiary product.
jnj, johnson and johnson, johnson & johnson, victim, mesh, hip, levaquin, risperdal
Wealthy Most at Risk for Harm by Johnson & Johnson and Subsidiary Products (2016, August 22)
If you make over $100,000 a year, you are far more likely than lower incomes to become a victim of a Johnson & Johnson and/or subsidiary product.
healthcare, cost, co-pay, risk, deductable, insurance, victim, salary
Second Quarter 2016 Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson Leap Again From 82,200 to 90,700 (2016, August 4)
Growing every quarter, lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson in United States alone are now well over 90,700.
talc, risperdal, asr, hip, baby powder, tvt, mesh, lawsuit
Johnson & Johnson Animas Defective Diabetes Devices (2016, August 4)
Gosh and golly gee willikers, yet another Johnson & Johnson subsidiary, Animas, totally sucks, jah?
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, animas, vibe, diabetes, insulin, device, pump
Johnson & Johnson Ethicrap, I Mean EthiCON, More JNJ JUNK (2016, July 25)
As I've mentioned, Johnson & Johnson has so many bad products I have to put a bunch in each article now to try to keep up. Now for EthiCON crap.
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, ethicon, harmonic ace, morcellator, physiomesh, secure strap, stapler
Johnson and Johnson Janssen Xarelto Slaughter (2016, July 8)
Overstating benefits, downplaying (or not disclosing) risks. Xarelto by Johnson and Johnson Janssen killing people left and right. Over 500 DEAD, 7,100 lawsuits already. Lovely, eh?
false, marketing, death, dead, xarelto, FDA, lawsuit, Janssen
This Convinced THREE Juries That Johnson and Johnson Talc Increases Ovarian Cancer (2016, May 14)
One very simple fact convinced THREE juries that Johnson & Johnson talc increases risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Johnson and Johnson, Johnson & Johnson, baby, powder, cancer, lawsuit, ovarian, talc
Control of the e-cig and vaping market is the latest issue facing consumers. Large pharmaceutical companies, including Johnson & Johnson, are totally against this new market and have already begun lobbying government officials in the UK, and pushed the United States Food and Drug Administration to regulate e-cigs and vape products. President Obama has turned the Democrats against this quickly growing market, leading a movement for a ban. Although the reasons why aren't exactly clear, it appears as though they claim e-cigs and vape products encourage people to become or remain addicted to terribly harmful nicotine. Uh, wuht? The amount of nicotine in an e-cig or vape product per stated dose is no more of a stimulant than a cup of horribly addictive coffee. So, reducing harm can't really be the issue, since there is quite a bit less harm in an e-cig or vape product than a conventional tobacco cigarette.
The e-cig and vape sites that claim JNJ is flat out lying about potential risks associated with e-cigs and vaping devices, well, are likely correct. After losing the Risperdal battle to the tune of $1.2 billion, when they appealed the decision, Johnson & Johnson actually tried to defend themselves by claiming the false marketing used to fraudulently increase sales of Risperdal and other drugs was their Constitutional Right covered under Second Amendment Freedom of Speech. Yes, I'm serious, follow the link to the article I wrote about the Attorney General who tried the case.
As for the claims by Johnson & Johnson that using e-cigs and vaping devices may be a hazard to your health, I seriously doubt they really care. This is a company that numerous organizations fought for over 20 years to remove formaldehyde and other known carcinogens from consumer goods, especially the products intended for use by newborns and children.
Major media is spinning it to appear as though Johnson & Johnson is great for being the first major seller of consumer personal care products to remove all known, and a couple suspected, carcinogens. However, they did not willingly reformulate without carcinogens, they were forced to by Walmart. If you live in the US, you realize that if Walmart refuses to sell it, the product HAS to be bad. If Johnson & Johnson can continue poisoning babies until forced to remove the carcinogens by a corporation that will sell almost any type of cheap crap, I seriously doubt they actually care about the health and safety of the ingredients in e-liquids for e-cigs or vaporizers.
Johnson & Johnson doesn't exactly have a great track record when it comes to reliable devices. Without hesitation they continue selling known defective devices until they run out of stock. They know full well that they will not only profit from the known defective devices, but also the devices that will need to be purchased to replace the defective devices. In their warped minds, a defective product is a good thing, kind of a two-for-one deal. Obviously, they don't really care if anyone becomes injured or dies from the use of the known defective device, the profit is far more important than the health, safety and lives of their trusting customers. It's probably not a good idea to trust them to make high-quality e-cig and vaping devices that deliver an accurate dose of e-liquid (with or without nicotine) every time.


Health organizations appear to be concerned about e-cigs and vaping devices being safe, advertised to children, youth, young adults and never-smokers. Although I don't purchase many print publications, I'm not seeing ads that are obviously intended to entice children, youth, young adults and never-smokers. What I see are advertisements with adults in adult situations who would like a cigarette - not even targeting never-smokers, around 1% of users - as a more convenient, safer alternative to smoking conventional tobacco cigarettes. Johnson & Johnson knowing sold adult dose, untested Risperdal to children - knowing it would cause them long-term health issues, profits from breast removal, etc. E-cig and vaping companies have been acting with ethics since the beginning of the industry. The executives and marketing team are obviously adults showing ethics in marketing and do not need to be told not to market to kids and non-smokers.
Johnson & Johnson advertisements against vaping and e-cigs exclaim, "Don't vape, QUIT!" and then go on to promote one of their boring, doctor visit, prescription and co-pay required products. It's been proven that these products come with a very high relapse rate. Over 90% of e-cig and/or vapor users who had tried a pharmaceutical product, such as nicotine gum, nicotine patch, nicotine spray, etc, responded that the pharmaceutical products were ineffective at helping them quit smoking conventional, tobacco cigarettes. Studies are quickly piling up showing that previous tobacco smokers who try e-cigs or vaping, switch completely to this new, flavorful, cleaner and far less harmful way to maintain their nicotine addiction. Nicotine by itself is no more harmful to the human body than caffeine or sugar, and any of them may be addictive to certain individuals. Shall we make it so ALL have to be boring, require a doctor visit, prescription and co-pay to acquire? E-cigs and e-liquids contain the same dose per use as a conventional tobacco cigarette, not some crazy drug. But without second-hand smoke, without tons of cigarette butts all over the place, without the stench and most importantly - without the extreme health risks associated with conventional tobacco products.
Johnson & Johnson is losing money not only on their close-to-useless, expensive smoking cessation products, but also the profits from the harmful effects of smoking as more nicotine addicts switch to e-cigs and vaping products. They aren't concerned about safety of the devices, safety of the e-liquid, potential lack of ethics in marketing or anything regarding your health.
They're fighting tooth and nail to get control of e-cigs and vaping because they're watching a few billion dollars a year go up, well, um, in a lovely, blueberry, vapor mist :o)
This article is really getting around the net!
Quoted by SpinFuel: The Art of Vaping. Follow on twitter @Spinfuel_News
1. Rick Manning (2014, January 3). Why do nanny-staters hate e-cigarettes? The Hill. Retrieved from http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/state-local-politics/194395-why-do-nanny-staters-hate-e-cigarettes
2. Timothy P. Carney (2013, November 19). Big Pharma, not tobacco companies, wages war on electronic cigarettes Washington Examiner. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/big-pharma-not-tobacco-companies-wages-war-on-electronic-cigarettes/article/2539441
3. Emily Patterson (2012, April 13). Johnson & Johnson Risperdal: Broken Laws and Side Effects Johnson and Toxin. Retrieved from http://www.johnsonandtoxin.com/risperdal.shtml
4. Emily Patterson (2013, June 20). Johnson & Johnson Defense Against $1.2 Billion Arkansas Risperdal: We Have a Constitutional Right to Lie Publication. Retrieved from http://www.johnsonandtoxin.com/right_to_lie.shtml
5. Anne D'Innocenzio (2013, September 12). Walmart To Ban Toxic Chemicals From Some Products Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/12/walmart-hazardous-chemicals_n_3915480.html
6. Emily Patterson (2013, May 6). Will YOU Use Johnson & Johnson Sedation Device? Johnson and Toxin. Retrieved from http://www.johnsonandtoxin.com/jnj_sedation_device.shtml
7. Associated Press (2014, December 19). University of Arizona (US) researchers to study use of e-cigarettes KSWT-TV. Retrieved from http://www.kswt.com/story/27581135/uofa-researchers-to-study-use-of-e-cigarettes
8. E-Cig Germany (Material for February 2015 Conference). Inside the German E-Cigarette Market ECig Germany: Industry Conference. Retrieved from http://www.ecig-germany.com/media/1000686/34921.pdf
9. Google Ongoing Survey (2014, December 10). Canadian Vaping Survey Google database. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1FUAlD-cvY5gTWRPXEMk-Ttfhwj_CVpFxgAiw3lzEdRQ/viewanalytics?usp=form_confirm
10. Brad Rodu (2014, November 25). Britain: E-Cigarettes Almost Exclusively Used by Smokers and Ex-Smokers The Heartland Institute. Retrieved from http://blog.heartland.org/2014/11/britain-e-cigarettes-almost-exclusively-used-by-smokers-and-ex-smokers/
11. Michael Lindenberger, Alexandra Skillman (2014, August 5). EC Forum Announces Survey Results of More Than 10,000 E-Cigarette Users as the FDA Public Comment BusinessWire. Retrieved from http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20140805006174/en/EC-Forum-Announces-Survey-Results-10000-E-Cigarette#.VIex1MlCz1W
12. Peter Hajek (2014, December 9). Electronic cigarettes have a potential for huge public health benefit Biomed Central. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/225

All contents Copyright © 2012-2017 Emily Patterson / Johnson and Toxin. All rights reserved.
Web Site and Admin Info:
Privacy Policy
Site Statistics
Site Resources
Financial Disclosure

Recently Posted:
2015 Johnson & Johnson US Lawsuit Update: Jump from 48,500 to 56.500
Johnson & Johnson Plans to Expand Healthcare Cost Crisis and Product Liability in Asia
Who REALLY Pays for Drug Development? US TAXPAYERS - $21 BILLION for fiscal year 2014
Johnson & Johnson Janssen Xarelto Marketed In Violation of FDA Regulations
Johnson & Johnson Destroys Thousands of Files Related to Vaginal Mesh
Johnson & Johnson: The Global Lawsuit Company

Most Popular:
The Ever-Growing Number of Lawsuits Against Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson Credo Analysis
Johnson & Johnson $4 Billion for DePuy Hip Harm in U.S., With Lawsuits in at Least 4 More Countries