The content you requested is below this very important information...
WITHOUT FINANCIAL SUPPORT, this list of content, six years of work WILL BE GONE FROM THE INTERNET. SURVIVING ON AN EXTREMELY LIMITED INCOME, I HAVE NO MONEY TO PUT INTO THIS EFFORT.
The site has had well over 2 MILLION page views. I've received thousands of emails from victims asking how the hell Johnson & Johnson gets away with slaughtering people with their products. Gee, likely because there is no financial support for this side of the fight to expose the horrendous flood of harmful products and the corruption that allows this crap to get on the market in the first place.
SO RUN ALONG AND POISON YOUR OWN BABIES AT THE REQUEST OF JOHNSON & JOHNSON...they obviously don't want to give up their easy money from talc cancer victims ;o)
MOMS AND DADS IN THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES (United States, European Union, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Israel, South Africa, Turkey, and Indonesia) PAY VERY CLOSE ATTENTION TO JOHNSON & JOHNSON STATEMENTS ON TALC
THEY ARE FLAT OUT REFUSING TO REMOVE TALC FROM PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR BABIES OR FEMALE HYGEINE: Johnson & Johnson has set up an entire web site to continue bullshitting people about the safety of products containing talc. Here is the J&J BULLSHIT "TALC IS SAFE DAMMIT" SITE. Their own internal documents PROVE they are well aware that talc increases the risk of developing LUNG CANCER, gee, just lost the first lawsuit for talc causing LUNG CANCER. It has also been shown that talc likely increases the risk of developing ovarian cancer by at least 30%. Ovarian cancer is a SILENT KILLER - pretty much once you realize you have it, you're dead.
However, no one needs to bother trying to read and interpret stacks of study results because Johnson & Johnson's own internal documents, such as this, PROVE they are well-aware of the health risks related to the use of talc-based products:
"... the talc industry will be perceived by the public like it perceives the cigarette industry: denying the obvious in the face of all evidence to the contrary."
Johnson & Johnson quite literally convinced three generations of women to poison their own babies with known cancer-causing talc. They tossed it at us for FREE in MATERNITY WARDS FOR GOD'S SAKES! I don't know about you, but I'm not real thrilled about the fact that I was lied to and convinced to poison MY OWN BABIES with Johnson & Johnson cancer-causing baby products, the original reason I started this web site.
Today is April 24, 2018 at 11:00 PM Eastern US time.
I have no money to pay the server fees on the 26th of April. Without help, the site goes down, deleting THIS ENTIRE LIST OF OVER 150 ARTICLES EXPOSING MASSIVE HARM BY JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARY PRODUCTS, as well as corruption in the United States Food and Drug Administration, more corruption in the United States Senate HELP Committee, the committee responsible for overseeing the United States Food and Drug Administration. Also, I have discovered that Mr. and Mrs. Obama BOTH worked for Sidley Austin, a corporate DEFENSE attorney group with experience defending Johnson & Johnson and other pharmaceutical companies. Michelle was a partner and Barack her understudy intern.
This site has had over 2 MILLION page views since I put it online in March of 2012. Numerous visitors, such as Johnson & Johnson, global financial institutions, global health organizations, insurance companies, other pharma, gov agencies such as US CDC, US FDA, US Senate, US Homeland Security, US Department of Defense, etc. Basically, all the corrupt...and yes, I can prove the visits by logged IP address. For example, the site has received over 6,000 visits from Johnson & Johnson servers alone.
This site is being watched DAILY by all these very important people.
I have got to raise $250 to keep this work online.
I have a fixed income and cannot pay for all this myself.
Will you please help?
Raised as of 11:00 PM April 24, 2018 Eastern US time: $0
Not ONE PENNY since February. I have no money to keep this online. I'm very sorry I have no money. I could, and did, do all the work, but not enough support to continue.
Still need to raise $250 before April 26, 2018
This six years of work is the LARGEST, if not the ONLY, site exposing the massive consumer harm by Johnson & Johnson products and the corruption in the United States government that allows Johnson & Johnson and their 260+ subsidiaries to continue pushing KNOWN HARMFUL consumer goods, pharmaaceuticals and medical devices on consumers around the world.
If the site goes down, I will have no way to come up with even more money to put it back up. PLEASE HELP KEEP THAT FROM HAPPENING
Please enter any amount you can contribute, even if only a few dollars. I do NOT post who sent the gift unless the giver specifically requests their contact information posted with the gift amount. By law, givers of gifts under $13,000 do NOT have to be disclosed during any audit, and I'm pretty certain no one will contribute anywhere near that much! I truly value your privacy. I do not ever request help via email or any other means, I send a 'thank you' and delete your contact information. Gifts are sent through PayPal and I do NOT have access to any transaction information, ensuring YOUR safety and privacy.
Since Orsinger and Caruso danced around issues of price competition and lack of consumer sales growth and basically said nothing, I figured I'd give him a real answer.
Keywords: obama, Michael Weinstein, jp morgan, JNJ, invest, stock, financial, analyst
Date Created/Edited: October 17, 2013
J. P. Morgan and Company
Healthcare Equipment and Supplies
277 Park Avenue Floor 39
New York, New York 10172
RE: Johnson & Johnson 3rd Quarter Teleconference: 14 October 2013
Dear Michael Weinstein,
My name is Emily Patterson. I am the creator of and researcher for a web site called Johnson and Toxin. After reading the transcript of the 3rd quarter 2013 teleconference with Johnson & Johnson Vice President of Finance, Dominic Caruso and Johnson & Johnson Worldwide Chairman of DePuy Synthes companies, Michel Orsinger, I felt your questions required a little more realistic clarification.
I feel the interesting questions you asked during the teleconference deserved a far deeper, and more accurate, explanation. You were wondering if Dominic Caruso was referring to lower price competition in the U.S., global or a combination.
After recalls of over 100,000 defective hips, TVTMesh, defective knees, anal staplers, and more over the last few years, Johnson & Johnson is paving the way for competitors to surpass the pathetically low quality and testing standards at Johnson & Johnson and subsidiary companies. Johnson & Johnson prices must stay inflated to compensate for billions of dollars in lawsuits and settlements from these known defective devices. This opens the door for companies with higher ethics, standards and quality controls to charge far less for similar products - because they are far superior to the products offered by Johnson & Johnson.
In your statement you mentioned that there was only 1% growth in the Johnson & Johnson Consumer Segment. As you know, the previous CEO, Bill Weldon, allowed Johnson & Johnson facilities to deteriorate to the point of literal urine bottles in closets. Although it was promised that the facilities would be back up and running at the end of last year, excuse after excuse and $100 million later, Johnson & Johnson is still under consent decree with the United States Food and Drug Administration.
In addition, Johnson & Johnson is still experiencing recalls of products in many countries: January, Aveeno Baby Lotion in the U.S.; March, KY Lubricants in the U.S.; May, baby powder in India (with FDA of India shutting down plant); May, Children's Tylenol in South Korea with ensuing product restrictions; June, Yogurt drink in the United Kingdom; September, Children's Motrin in the U.S. So, as you can see, recalls continue to be an issue, reducing sales and potential for growth until Johnson & Johnson finds a way to improve the consistent quality of their products.
One other point you should consider, as consumers become educated as to the risks of cancer associated with certain ingredients in Johnson & Johnson products, especially baby products, many are choosing other safer sources with fewer chemicals to reduce health risks for their children. This is yet another factor reducing consumer sales growth.
I hope this provided a more detailed explanation for your concerns,
Emily Patterson cc:
1. TRANSCRIPT (2013, October 15). Johnson & Johnson's Management Discusses Q3 2013 Results - Earnings Call Transcript. Seeking Alpha. Retrieved from http://seekingalpha.com/article/1746172-johnson-and-johnsons-management-discusses-q3-2013-results-earnings-call-transcript?page=11&p=qanda&l=last